The scandal involving the UK government and The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation takes an even more sinister turn into the darkness of corruption, racketeering and crimes against humanity with the announcement of the UK Vaccine Network.
The UK Vaccine Network appears, on the surface, to bring together industry, academia and relevant funding bodies in an impartial group, to discuss the way forward in developing a vaccine for the Covid-19 virus.
However, the grim truth is that UK Vaccine Network appears to be nothing more than a smoke screen created by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, WHO, GlaxoSmithKline and the British Government to green light a deal that has already been done behind closed doors.
Some “electromagnetic fields (EMFs)… are naturally generated, for instance by the sun, the earth or even our own bodies… [There are also artificial electromagnetic fields which are] produced by household appliances, power lines, power transformers, electrical substations, mobile phones, etc” (Pascual, p. 29).
The UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE) state that “EMFs arise whenever electrical energy is used” (n.p), and that “it has been known for a long time that exposure of people to high levels of EMFs can give rise to acute effects” (n.p).
In September 1943, the US Army created “Operation Capricious,” a secret biowarfare program described as purely defensive against insect pests enemy nations might use against America by bombing America with germ-infected insects. Under the direction of George W. Merck, president of Merck & Co. The program stockpiled bacillus anthracis (anthrax), clostridium botulinum (botulism), and other deadly bacteria until President Truman approved and operationalized its use by the U.S. military, in 1952, on North Korea and China where, like previous biowarfare efforts, it proved ineffectual.
The analogy is very simple: would you wear a baking sieve over your face to protect youself from an aerosolised virus?
Even the most ardent mask-wearers would think that is ridiculous. In the same way that trying to catch a butterfly with a hula-hoop or using barbed-wire fencing to keep out midges is ridiculous.
Why? Because, and it hardly needs explained, that even a toddler knows smaller things can go through bigger things. Toddlers do it every day with their toys, especially the toys that use objects to be placed into different shaped holes. They can fit the smaller object through the larger hole.
It’s so obvious. Yet in our New Middle Ages where society’s ‘progress’ is being exposed as a mirage, the simple idea that smaller objects can pass through gaps that are bigger than them seems to have been forgotten, unlearned, dismissed.
Many mask wearers seem to be are unaware of the fact that, although you cannot see something, it does not mean that there isn’t something there. We cannot see tiny droplets of water, human cells, toxins, viruses, germs, and bacteria with our naked eyes yet they are still there. We cannot see them because they are microscopic, far beyond natural human capacities to perceive without aid from technology.
To return to the analogy of a sieve, if you started wearing a sieve to protect you from an aerosolised virus, you would soon discover that even the largest bits of spittel you breathed out onto your sieve would be blown out as smaller droplets on subsequent breaths. Exactly the same thing happens at the microscopic level when miniscule droplets of water, potentially filled with virus, pass through the gaps in the fibres in your mask (they can also come out through the gaps round the side of your mask).
If you can breathe, you can contract and spread virus. (The exception being if you’re sealed-up in a hamzat suit with your own separate oxygen supply. And if mask wearers want to spend their lives in those, then they are welcome.)
Still people use their mask, regardless of reason, which has allowed the meaning of the act and object to change. Not being a practical device to prevent viral spread, the mask has now become a totem. An object of superstitious veneration that separates Us – ‘the responsible’, ‘the selfless’ and ‘the caring’ – from the non-mask wearing Them – ‘the selfish’, ‘the spreaders’ and now ‘the murderers’.
And like all totems, it demarcates a tribe. The worship of the mask are now one tribe and the sceptics another. At this point, we seem to have passed beyond logical inquiry and are now penetratinginto the subconscious, the ‘heart of darkness’ of vast swathes of individuals where the issues are about need, identity, security and fear.
If only mask-wearers could see what truly drives these latent fear-filled actions of obedience, superstition and rejection of science, then this could be over very quickly. Yet they are in denial for a host of reasons beyond the scope of this blog, but those causes are very deep-rooted, probably traumatising to re-live, and not easily resolved.
As remarked elsewhere, we are entering an era of Neo-Feudalism and if you are going to have a society premised on superior people then you need an ignorant class to justify the hierarchy, to both groups. What better example of foolish, simplicity could there be than to wear a piece of cloth over your mouth thinking that it can somehow repel a particle that it requires an electron microscope to see?
Watching all this, the Neo-Feudalists must feel secure in their Right to take control of the commanding heights of the economy and direct their self-enslaved serfs to whatever ends they choose.
If this is to be resisted and overcome, it’s clear that the psychological issues of people need to be addressed, now and in the future. For they are cutting people off from their Reason and when that happens, they threaten to take us all into the Politics of the Absurd.
The crimes of the Nazi regime in Germany have been repeatedly denounced for decades. People are familiar with the anti-semitism that was rife in Germany before Hitler came to power and its intensification during his government.
However, it has always puzzled thoughtful observers why a reasonably well-educated, liberal people could, within a few short years, accept, then actively and enthusiasitcally participate in calls by the state to murder people who were sometimes family members, often neighbours and who had even fought alongside Germans as Germans in the First World War.
There were many themes, motifs and narratives utilised by Goebbels, all long-standing but given a contemporary twist, to persuade Germans of the ‘Jewish threat’: Jewish people as usurpers of national culture, as international conspirators and as murderous communists. However, one of the most powerful slogans was to claim that Jewish people carried a bacilus, a bacteria, that threatened Germans literally and metaphorically, as part of the body politic.
Elimination had could be the only answer. A little bit like Zero-Covid, but with focused only on one section of the populace.
People who are frightened will do terrible things. Although there was plenty of hunger for ‘revenge’ against Jewish people combined with a high degree of social pressue to be an anti-semite, nothing quite so easily explains the almost complete cooperation of ‘humane’ Germans in death squads, death camps and death marches that continued, openly, for years.
Why say ‘humane’? Because ordinary Germans, in many instances, were not brain-washed murderers; they retained their ethical abilities separate from government propaganda for a prolonged period well into the Third Reich regime. In the late 30s, under the Nazi Euthanasia program which saw German doctors take the lives of 70 000 people whom they deemed to have a ‘life unworthy of living’, Germans protested to such a degree, the state backed down. These were not the actions of captured-minds of a docile, terrified citizenry. The majority only finally became co-conspirators in genocide, due simply to pressure and panic by the threat of disease; with prejudices sharpened and a perceived insidious threat, their humanity did not stretch to encircle Jewish friends and neighbours whose mere presence might take the lives of their loved ones.
People are terrified of bacteria, viruses, undetectable organisms that may kill them. It is a fear that is unrelenting; a fearful person can, by their own estimation, never know when they are safe. Simple obsessions begin to govern all actions: Kill the virus! Destroy the means of transmission! Eliminate the carrier – whether its actions, animals or people.
How easy can it be to take the latent feelings and ideas of any group, dealing with life’s stresses and strains, increase their fear and then direct it towards others? Goebbels, Goering and Hitler found it to be almost ridiculously easy, and boasted about it, even at Nuremburg.
The reason why this is relevant today, aside from the use of medical threats to cover a politcal agenda, is that the BBC’s tone is becoming decidedly nastier. And it’s being directed towards a particular category of people: dissenters from the COVID-medical-fear-complex.
Last week Radio 5 Live interviewed a professor working in an intensive care unit, Hugh Montgomery, who claimed that people ‘not washing hands’ and ‘not wearing masks’ had ‘blood on their hands’. – Slightly interesting, in the light of the previously mentioned Nazis, Montgomery’s a research professor at University College London, a university that has a long engagement with Eugenics, even allowed Francis Galton, ‘the Father of Eugenics’, to pioneer his work there. Recently, the univeristy has been called to apologise for this association, a recommendation part of a report inquiring into UCL’s eugenicist past. The majority of committee members of this investigation, nine out of sixteen, refused to sign the report and the findings were further criticised when it was revealed that a secret Eugenics meeting was run at the university but did not feature in the inquiry. It should also be noted that Professor Montgomery researches within the field of human performance which includes examining genetic impacts in certain areas. No implication that he is a Eugenicist or a Nazi should be inferred or that he was motivated to increase hysteria about the current situation and assist a political agenda, of course.
This was followed-up in the same week by the BBC with an interview on the same station, Radio 5 Live, where Laura Duffel, a Matron from an unnamed London hospital (King’s College Hospital apparently), claimed that children are being affected by Covid in this second wave, as well as people in their twenties and thirties. A message that clearly implied that now children were at risk, despite there being a mass of evidence, up to this point, that they are not. (An interesting point about Ms Duffel is that she also lends her name and position to a private company, Qmatic, who are hoping to lead solutions of implementation to organisations administering the COVID-19 vaccination, along with other shots. No doubt they stand to profit from delivering mass vaccinations within the NHS. Again, no implication that Ms Duffel has any financial interest in Qmatic or will receive any renumeration for the interview she gave to Radio 5 Live should be inferred.)
It’s clear to see an unpleasant narrative, with a more pointed threat to lives and obvious guilty parties to blame, is building. The more the fear is increased, the more people will look search for scapegoats. If the intensification of panic about a ‘second wave’ continues, or a third or a fourth, then the embryonic signs are that the finger will be pointed at those who are using common sense and science to approach this situation, and are thus choosing to dissent as ethical individuals, grounded on a moral platform.
When it becomes more overt than it is now, when dissenters are decried daily from the bully-pulpit media and the government benches, then we’ll know we’ve gone Full-Nazi. Well, everyone will know but those pointing the fingers…
In the largest grossing film of all time, Marvel’s The Avengers Endgame, the villain wanted to reduce the population of the universe by half, for its own good. It was a philanthropic action, completely benign, from which Thanos, the villain, stood not to profit from.
Bill Gates too shares the comic character’s concerns about too many mouths, not on a universal scale, yet; for now, just here on Earth. Whether he is quite so philanthropic as Thanos is questionable: he does seem to profit financially out of vaccines and medicines greatly.
Gates believes that the world population is on a trajectory to 9 billion. However, if ‘we’ do a really good job with vaccines and reproductive services, it can be lowered by 10% to 15%. We should be grateful for small mercies that it’s not more.
Bill Gates is not an eccentric billionaire outlier who worries about Malthusian collapse. He is one of the prominent voices and leaders of a movement that in essence is over 200 years old but one that really started to believe it could effect the world with the scientific discoveries and ideas of the Victorian age.
Charles Darwin propounded Natural Selection, Evolution and Inheritance as fundamental ideas of natural history and science. These ideas were welcomed in the 19th Century as a massive forward step in mankind’s understanding of the world. However, the light of knowledge was also to cast a shadow that still exists to the present day.
Darwin had a cousin named Francis Galton who held strong views on race. Galton came to believe that differences in intellect could be explained by lineage, where, at the beginning at least, Darwin thought patience and perseverance explained the difference in cultural achievements between people. By exerting control over ‘organic evolution’, Galton argued, society could direct traits in the direction of its choosing.
Galton’s theories probably would have died with him, if the 19th Century monk Gregor Mengel’s work had not introduced a scientific basis to the idea of transmissable hereditary factors through ‘units’ (genes), and if two Americans, Charles Davenport and Harry Laughlin, had not zealously embraced these ideas.
From this intersection of interests, racism, class and science, a programme of sterilisation through injection was conducted on some of America’s poorest – whites, blacks and native Americans. The victims were told that this was a medical necessity. Some fought back legally. Yet, in a famous ruling, the Supreme Court endorsed this policy with the judgement written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. His words have reverberated down the generations:
“We have seen more than once that the public welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the strength of the State for these lesser sacrifices, often not felt to be such by those concerned, in order to prevent our being swamped with incompetence. It is better for all the world if, instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. . . . Three generations of imbeciles are enough.“
Justice oliver wendell holmes jr
Inspired by such sentiments, the Nationalist Socialists of Germany modelled their racial laws on the United States. It was during the Nazi era that leadership of the now global Eugenics Movement passed to Germany where the infamous Joseph Mengele practised the type of human experiments brazenly that some of his North American colleagues could only do secretly or face political resistance.
After 1945, Eugenics were the antithesis of enlightened humanity. Nonetheless, the ideas, some of its practises and even its experiments, did not go away. Instead, they survived in many of the same places with name changes and a ‘humanitarian’ front. Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, was still able to publicly advocate abortion as a socially progressive ideal while at the same time hiding her more distasteful views on the poor and non-white races.
Father of Bill Gates, William Gates Sr, sat on the board of Planned Parenthood, was even the head of it for a time, and knew Sanger quite well. He would have been aware of The Negro Project through which Sanger hoped that Black community leaders would advocate abortion as a way of alleviating African-American ‘social troubles’.
Are we witnessing a Thanos-like reduction of the population using vaccines as some kind of super-weapon? A truth-seeking journalist should ask Bill Gates. The problem is finding Bill Gates…and a truthful journalist.
Or it might be ‘epsilon’ instead of ‘peasant’ or it may be ‘prole’; whatever term is deployed by our hauteur ‘masters’, it is one that will remind the addressed that they are of a lower social, cultural and economic status than the speaker. It is probably optimistic to say that the addresse would be a second-class citizen; probably optimistic to say even a third-class citizen. The direction of travel already shows a canyon of privileges, rights and power exist between the richest and poorest in the world that several gradated classes can be traced between top and bottom. They now simply have to be ossified into a permanent hierarchy, each with their own rules, and people taught their particular station in life, the swelling preponderance of humans located at the bottom. Lockdown has been the most obvious, but not the first step in this process.
These actions are part of the often-discussed ‘Great Reset’, a top down revolution publicly fronted by the World Economic Forum, which is completely open about its intentions and is well on the way to implementing this ‘reconfiguring’ of global society. The consequences, if attained, will be the end of a democratic, meritocracy: people will have to make do with much less; they will no longer be striving to accumulate power and status, or perhaps more accurately for most people, a better standard of life and opportunities for their children. Expectations of what you or your children can be or do, will be limited from here on forwards. Justified on the grounds of sustainability and the environment. Although, given the reforms not taken and inventions not used, this appears more as a convenient veneer, when it is in fact an elite group ensuring that all innovation and control of resources will be in their hands and theirs alone, expropriating power in order to take a step to the future – back to a familiar Medieval past.
Unlike the feudalism of previous centuries, this neo-feudalism will be a bio-techno one. It will integrate spheres of life – monetary, genomic, health, travel, military, environmental and more – using futuristic means and bringing them all, along with the human population, under global governance. Given the use of advanced technology, the range and detail of control, combined with an enveloping censorship, dominance is likely to be far more intimate than in previous societies. There’ll be no escaping to a forest to live freely as a brigand or take to the open seas, roaming widely as a pirate. ‘Freedom’, as understood for centuries, will be a misnomer.
Integrating humanity with a digital world may have idealistic overtures of happiness and harmony, all moderated through a digi-bio-tech apparatus, yet it might be worth pointing out that the system will be designed by Someone Else. It will be controlled by Someone Else. And the price of societal aims, objectives defined by that small group of people is the sacrifice of the individual alongside his or her desires and dreams. Perhaps, not so terrible if our new leaders are to be enlightened and benevolent? However, the conceivers of this coming state, through their actions throughout the COVID-19 ‘pandemic’, which betray a withering contempt for humanity, destroy any hope of this.
As illustrated over the past nine months, the midwives birthing this New World are Lies, Half-Truths, Deception, Fear-Mongering and Invasive-Monitoring and, as its parents, they indicate its likely future development. Their use in this entire affair only confirms the underlying premise of the Elite: people are obedient, conformist, superstitious, frightened and irrational. With such assumptions about the populace, it seems very unlikely that a non-hierarchical, egalitarian, enlightened society is being prepared.
The justification for this re-making of everything? It is very similar to the same reasons given by the Medieval Catholic Church which too sought to subsume the individual in parallel with repressing genuine scientific enlightenment – human beings are avaricious, aggressive, manipulative and violent. Building on these postulates, the new regime structure could very well look like an Ancient Regime, updated.
If that’s the case, then we, The People, had better get used to our new nomenclature whether ‘peasant’, ‘epsilon’, ‘prole’ or worse.