Reposting this that David Clews shared – Anna De Buisseret and Simone Plaut signed off on a fantastic and tough letter that Parents/Guardians/Advocates can send on behalf of their Children to ensure that under NO CIRCUMSTANCES will they be allowed to be given any experimental gene therapies while at School.
Dear Head Teacher,
I am the Parent/Guardian/Advocate for …………………………………………… (child at your school).
I have sought expert advice and established that my child named above is at unacceptable risk of suffering a life threatening adverse event following the Covid-19 vaccination.
As a result of this I demand you do not allow anyone to vaccinate my child at any time.
The JCVI advice upon which the decision to proceed with the vaccine rollout is generalised for all children, and has NOT BEEN INDIVIDUALISED FOR MY PARTICULAR CHILD and I will not permit you to risk ENDANGERING his/her health, or even his/her life in the interests of society at large. You should be aware that there is an injunction application currently under way to the courts https://www.laworfiction.com/2021/09/injunction-application-made-to-court-to-pause-roll-out/.
With the help of our advisors, we have investigated the various risk factors that pertain to this injection including excipient allergens, and other components. The detailed assessment has been made on an individual basis for my child and his/her health history, medication history and diet, as well as predisposition to health issues within our family.
As the parent/guardian for my child I am ultimately responsible for their safety and wellbeing and do not delegate this to you in this regard as you cannot possibly be expected to have the time to explore to this level of detail for each and every individual child in your care.
Based on the detailed findings of this risk assessment, I expressly forbid this vaccination to be given to my child and will hold you PERSONALLY both civilly and criminally responsible for any harm that arises in either the short term (anaphylactic shock) medium term or long term, including myocarditis, pericarditis, blood clotting abnormalities, neurological injury such as transverse myelitis, Bell’s palsy, damage to fertility, ovarian damage(delete if male) and impact on puberty, physical maturation etc.
Information about the uneven distribution of this novel medicine within the bodies of children has not been sufficiently considered in the decision to extend to their age group, as per Pfizer’s own pharmacokinetics data, the risk of puberty blocking and the high rates of heart inflammation in young people especially boys, as reflected in the MHRA yellow card system all of which I consider negligent, so to proceed is failing YOUR DUTY OF CARE TO MY CHILD. The concept of using ‘Gillick competency’ which was established for fully reversible contraception, has been superseded by the 2020 case Bell v. Tavistock NHS Trust, which ruled that children DO NOT HAVE CAPACITY to decide about any experimental medical treatment that has permanent life altering impact. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bell-v-Tavistock-Clinic-and-ors-Summary.pdf
An individual’s rights cannot be set aside for the benefit of society, and the welfare of the child is PARAMOUNT; yet this seems to be the intention here. Children seldom experience severe illness if they catch the infection; injecting them with a medicine that has to date killed over 1600 and caused in excess of a million injuries in the UK alone, for minimal benefit to them personally is indefensible.
Where there are conflicting human rights; the welfare of the child is paramount and enshrined in law.
My child is not deemed mature enough to purchase alcohol or cigarettes, yet you expect him/her to decide about a medical treatment that could irreversibly damage his/her health.
I will be taking civil action against YOU personally if you FAIL TO protect my child from this medical procedure which has now been clearly identified as dangerous to MY CHILD.
…….………………………….. Signed Parent/Guardian of ……………………………..